Investigation Report: {Hypothesis Title}【免費下載鏈接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity項目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agentsVerdict: {Confirmed | Falsified | Inconclusive}Confidence: {High (80%) | Medium (50-80%) | Low (50%)}Confirming Evidencesrc/api/users.ts:47— {發(fā)現(xiàn)描述}src/middleware/auth.ts:23— {發(fā)現(xiàn)描述}Contradicting Evidencetests/api/users.test.ts:112— {反證描述}Causal Chain (if confirmed){第一因} →{中間效應(yīng)} →{可觀測癥狀}Recommended Fix{具體代碼變更及位置}Additional Notes{可能與其他假設(shè)相關(guān)的發(fā)現(xiàn)}[parallel-debugging/SKILL.md](https://link.gitcode.com/i/358ada0af98e6a6b4c3315afd12f7de5) 還給出了證據(jù)強度分級表這是仲裁時衡量證據(jù)質(zhì)量的標(biāo)尺 | 證據(jù)類型 | 強度 | 示例 | | --- | --- | --- | | Direct直接證據(jù) | Strong | file.ts:42 處的 if (x 0) 應(yīng)為 if (x 0) | | Correlational相關(guān)性 | Medium | 錯誤率在 commit abc123 之后上升 | | Testimonial口述 | Weak | 在我機器上是好的 | | Absence缺失性 | Variable | 代碼路徑中未發(fā)現(xiàn) null 檢查 | 置信度判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)High80%要求多份直接證據(jù) 清晰因果鏈 無反證Medium50-80%為部分直接證據(jù) 合理因果鏈 輕微模糊點Low50%為以相關(guān)性證據(jù)為主、因果鏈不完整、存在反證。 ## Phase 5仲裁Arbitration 所有 investigator 報告齊備后主流程執(zhí)行三步仲裁 **第一步對比各 investigator 的結(jié)論**把每個假設(shè)置于三種狀態(tài)之一 - Confirmed高置信度確認(rèn) - Falsified存在反證 - Inconclusive證據(jù)不足。 **第二步對確認(rèn)的假設(shè)排序**依據(jù)四項標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與 SKILL.md 的仲裁協(xié)議一致 1. 置信度High Medium Low 2. 因果鏈的強度 3. 支持性證據(jù)的數(shù)量 4. 是否存在反證。 參考文檔給出的完整仲裁決策樹All investigators reported? ├── NO → Wait for remaining reports └── YES → Count confirmed hypotheses ├── 0 confirmed │ ├── Any medium confidence? → Investigate further │ └── All low/falsified? → Generate new hypotheses ├── 1 confirmed │ └── High confidence? │ ├── YES → Declare root cause, propose fix │ └── NO → Flag as likely cause, recommend verification └── 2 confirmed └── Are they related? ├── YES → Compound issue (multiple contributing causes) └── NO → Rank by confidence, declare highest as primary即無假設(shè)被確認(rèn)時繼續(xù)深入或重新生成假設(shè)僅 1 個確認(rèn)且高置信則宣布為根因2 個以上確認(rèn)且相互關(guān)聯(lián)則判定為復(fù)合問題多個共同作用的原因。 **第三步輸出根因分析報告**命令規(guī)定了固定報告模板Debug Report: {error description}Root Cause (Most Likely)Hypothesis: {description}Confidence: {High/Medium/Low}Evidence: {summary with file:line citations}Causal Chain: {step-by-step from cause to symptom}Recommended Fix{specific fix with code changes}Other Hypotheses{hypothesis 2}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}{hypothesis 3}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}【免費下載鏈接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity項目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agents創(chuàng)作聲明：本文部分內(nèi)容由AI輔助生成（AIGC），僅供參考 Investigation Report: {Hypothesis Title}
Investigation Report: {Hypothesis Title}【免費下載鏈接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity項目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agentsVerdict: {Confirmed | Falsified | Inconclusive}Confidence: {High (80%) | Medium (50-80%) | Low (50%)}Confirming Evidencesrc/api/users.ts:47— {發(fā)現(xiàn)描述}src/middleware/auth.ts:23— {發(fā)現(xiàn)描述}Contradicting Evidencetests/api/users.test.ts:112— {反證描述}Causal Chain (if confirmed){第一因} →{中間效應(yīng)} →{可觀測癥狀}Recommended Fix{具體代碼變更及位置}Additional Notes{可能與其他假設(shè)相關(guān)的發(fā)現(xiàn)}[parallel-debugging/SKILL.md](https://link.gitcode.com/i/358ada0af98e6a6b4c3315afd12f7de5) 還給出了證據(jù)強度分級表這是仲裁時衡量證據(jù)質(zhì)量的標(biāo)尺 | 證據(jù)類型 | 強度 | 示例 | | --- | --- | --- | | Direct直接證據(jù) | Strong | file.ts:42 處的 if (x 0) 應(yīng)為 if (x 0) | | Correlational相關(guān)性 | Medium | 錯誤率在 commit abc123 之后上升 | | Testimonial口述 | Weak | 在我機器上是好的 | | Absence缺失性 | Variable | 代碼路徑中未發(fā)現(xiàn) null 檢查 | 置信度判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)High80%要求多份直接證據(jù) 清晰因果鏈 無反證Medium50-80%為部分直接證據(jù) 合理因果鏈 輕微模糊點Low50%為以相關(guān)性證據(jù)為主、因果鏈不完整、存在反證。 ## Phase 5仲裁Arbitration 所有 investigator 報告齊備后主流程執(zhí)行三步仲裁 **第一步對比各 investigator 的結(jié)論**把每個假設(shè)置于三種狀態(tài)之一 - Confirmed高置信度確認(rèn) - Falsified存在反證 - Inconclusive證據(jù)不足。 **第二步對確認(rèn)的假設(shè)排序**依據(jù)四項標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與 SKILL.md 的仲裁協(xié)議一致 1. 置信度High Medium Low 2. 因果鏈的強度 3. 支持性證據(jù)的數(shù)量 4. 是否存在反證。 參考文檔給出的完整仲裁決策樹All investigators reported? ├── NO → Wait for remaining reports └── YES → Count confirmed hypotheses ├── 0 confirmed │ ├── Any medium confidence? → Investigate further │ └── All low/falsified? → Generate new hypotheses ├── 1 confirmed │ └── High confidence? │ ├── YES → Declare root cause, propose fix │ └── NO → Flag as likely cause, recommend verification └── 2 confirmed └── Are they related? ├── YES → Compound issue (multiple contributing causes) └── NO → Rank by confidence, declare highest as primary即無假設(shè)被確認(rèn)時繼續(xù)深入或重新生成假設(shè)僅 1 個確認(rèn)且高置信則宣布為根因2 個以上確認(rèn)且相互關(guān)聯(lián)則判定為復(fù)合問題多個共同作用的原因。 **第三步輸出根因分析報告**命令規(guī)定了固定報告模板Debug Report: {error description}Root Cause (Most Likely)Hypothesis: {description}Confidence: {High/Medium/Low}Evidence: {summary with file:line citations}Causal Chain: {step-by-step from cause to symptom}Recommended Fix{specific fix with code changes}Other Hypotheses{hypothesis 2}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}{hypothesis 3}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}【免費下載鏈接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity項目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agents創(chuàng)作聲明：本文部分內(nèi)容由AI輔助生成（AIGC），僅供參考